Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: Chemtura Canada Co. (Re), 2008 NSSC 14

                                                                                                                              

     Date: 2008-01-21

  Docket: SH 283921

      Registry: Halifax

 

In the Matter of:                                   

The Amalgamation of Chemtura Canada Co./Cie

and Anderol Canada Corp.

                                                                                          Applicant

 

- and -

 

In the Matter of:

The Companies Act of Nova Scotia, being Chapter 81 of the

Revised Statutes of Nova Scotia, 1989, as amended

 

 

 

Judge:                   The Honourable Justice John D. Murphy

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

Judge:             The Honourable Justice John D. Murphy

 

Heard:                        {In Chambers} October 18, 2007 in Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Subject:                       Amalgamations - Publication Ban - Sealing of Financial Statements

 

 

Summary:       Two operating companies obtained court approval to amalgamate.  The amalgamated company asked the Court to seal the financial statements which had been filed in support of a request to have the Court waive giving of notice of the approval application to the amalgamating companies’ creditors, according to s.134(7) of the Companies Act.

 

 

Issue:              Should the financial statements be sealed? - Is publication ban warranted?

 

 

Result:            Documentation should not be sealed.


Applicant did not meet the test for publication ban/confidentiality order developed by Supreme Court of Canada in Dagenais/Mentuck/Sierra Club, which is the burden described in advice circulated to counsel when, effective July 1, 2007, the Court changed its practice of routinely sealing financial statements of amalgamating companies.

 

Confidentiality order was not necessary to prevent a serious risk to an important commercial interest in the context of litigation because reasonably‑alternative measures would not prevent the risk.  Nova Scotia Court of Appeal decision in Shannex Health Care Management v. Nova Scotia Attorney General distinguished, based on the legislation applicable and the evidence.

 

In this case, the “open court principle” outweighs the salutary effect of a confidentiality order.  Providing public access to information upon which the Court relied in exercising discretion to waive the statutory requirement that creditors receive notice is more important  than the desire of amalgamating companies to keep their financial information confidential.

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.            QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.