IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA
Citation: Sable Offshore Energy Inc. v. Ameron International Corporation,
2008 NSSC 53
Date: 20080220
Docket: SH 220343
Registry: Halifax
Between:
Sable Offshore Energy Inc., as agent for and on behalf of the Working Interest Owners of the Sable Offshore Energy Project, Exxonmobil Canada Properties, Shell Canada Limited, Imperial Oil Resources, Mosbacher Operating Ltd., and Pengrowth Corporation; Exxonmobil Canada Properties as operator of the Sable Offshore Energy Project
Plaintiffs
and
Ameron International Corporation; Ameron (UK) Limited; Ameron B.V.; Allcolour Paint Limited; Amercoat Canada; Rubyco Ltd.; Danroh Inc.; Serious Business Inc.; Barrier Limited; Parker Brothers Contracting Limited; Rko Steel Limited; Cher ubini Metal Works Limited; Comstock Canada Ltd.; Adam Clark Company Ltd.; A.B. Mechanical Limited; A & G Crane Rentals Limited carrying on business as A & G Crane Limited; A.M.L. Painting Limited; Argo Protective Coatings Incorporated; Allsteel Coating Limited; Mills Painting & Sandblasting Limited
Defendants
and
Amec E & C Services Limited, successor to Agra Monenco Inc., in their own right, Kellogg Brown & Root, a division of Haliburton Group Canada Inc. and Amec Black & McDonald Limited operating as BMS Offshore, successor to BMS Offshore Limited, in their own right and/or collectively operating as BBA, a joint venture
Third Parties
- 2 -
LIBRARY HEADING
Judge: The Honourable Justice Suzanne M. Hood
Heard: February 20, 2008 in Halifax, Nova Scotia
Written Decision: February 22, 2008 (Oral decision rendered on February 20, 2008)
Subject: Interrogatories
Summary: CPR 19; application to require plaintiff to answer lengthy Interrogatories (17 pages). Plaintiff says they are oppressive.
Issue: Are the Interrogatories oppressive?
Result: Overall effect of Interrogatories is oppressive. Principles set out for Interrogatories.
THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION. QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.