IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA
Citation: R. v. Bailey, 2008 NSSC 68
Date: 20080306
Docket: 278551
Registry: Pictou
Between:
Joseph Alexander Bailey
Appellant
v.
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
LIBRARY HEADING
Judge: The Honourable Justice Douglas L. MacLellan
Heard: January 22nd, 2008, in Pictou, Nova Scotia
Decision: March 6th, 2008
Subject: Criminal law, summary conviction appeal.
Summary: Appellant charged with refusal, impaired driving and driving while prohibited. Self-represented at trial. Trial judge found that he had refused a breath demand and was impaired and was also driving while prohibited. Trial judge stayed the refusal charge and entered convictions on the two other charges. Appellant alleged errors on how the trial judge conducted the trial and his finding of how the appellant’s Section 10(b) rights were dealt with by the police officer.
Issue: Did demand made by police officer conform to the information component about the availability of Legal Aid?
Did rulings made by trial judge result in an unfair trial?
Was defence of officially induced mistake dealt with properly by trial judge?
Trial judge’s ruling on information component of demand in error. R. v. Moore, [2002] N.S.J. No. 561, applied. However, refusal charge was stayed, therefore, no prejudice to appellant.
Trial rulings did not result in an unfair trial.
Driving while prohibited conviction upheld. Mistake of law by appellant on his right to drive in Nova Scotia and was no defence to charge.
THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION. QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.