Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: R. v. Bailey, 2008 NSSC 68

 

Date: 20080306

Docket: 278551

Registry: Pictou

 

Between:

Joseph Alexander Bailey

Appellant

v.

 

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

 

Judge:                   The Honourable Justice Douglas L. MacLellan

 

Heard:                  January 22nd, 2008, in Pictou, Nova Scotia

 

Decision:               March 6th, 2008

 

Subject:                Criminal law, summary conviction appeal.

 

Summary:             Appellant charged with refusal, impaired driving and driving while prohibited.  Self-represented at trial.  Trial judge found that he had refused a breath demand and was impaired and was also driving while prohibited.  Trial judge stayed the refusal charge and entered convictions on the two other charges.  Appellant alleged errors on how the trial judge conducted the trial and his finding of how the appellant’s Section 10(b) rights were dealt with by the police officer.

 

Issue:          Did demand made by police officer conform to the information component about the availability of Legal Aid?

 

Did rulings made by trial judge result in an unfair trial?

 


Was defence of officially induced mistake dealt with properly by trial judge?

 

Result:                  Appeal dismissed. 

 

Trial judge’s ruling on information component of demand in error.  R. v. Moore, [2002] N.S.J. No. 561, applied.  However, refusal charge was stayed, therefore, no prejudice to appellant.

 

Trial rulings did not result in an unfair trial.

 

Driving while prohibited conviction upheld.  Mistake of law by appellant on his right to drive in Nova Scotia and was no defence to charge.

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.