Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: Armour Group Ltd.  v. Halifax (Regional Municipality), 

 2008 NSSC 81

 

 

Date: 20080331

Docket: S.H. No. 288775

Registry: Halifax

 

Between:                             The Armour Group Limited

 

Plaintiff

v.

 

Halifax Regional Municipality, a body corporate

 

Defendant

 

 

 

 

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

Judge:             The Honourable Justice Walter R.E. Goodfellow

 

Heard:                        March 17, 2008 in Halifax,  Nova Scotia

 

Written Decision:       March 31, 2008

 

Subject:                       Declaratory Judgment - Mandamus     

 

Summary:                   Armour Group, owner of several properties designated as Heritage Properties, acquired Violet Clarke Building, 1872 Upper Water Street and in the 1970's side entrance designated as 1870 Upper Water Street.  Armour Group owns Historic Properties and for a period of time their office was located in 1870 Upper Water Street.  Armour have applied for a demolition permit for the Violet Clarke Building and initially various employees of HRM acknowledged that the property, 1870 Upper Water Street was wrongfully designated as an Historic Property.  HRM, however, altered their position and point to certain file material including an unsigned, undated notice relating to 1870 Upper Water Street and a registration of a further notice etc.

 


 

Page 2

 

 

 

 

Issue:                          1)         Was the Violet Clarke property designated a Heritage Property pursuant to the Heritage Property Act and so registered?

 

2)         If the answer to one is negative, should a mandamus order be issued?

 

 

 

Result:                        Concluded evidence overwhelmingly establishes any attempted designation by the City of Halifax was in error and the attempt at registration of the erroneous designation failed to comply with the statutory requirement of indexing and was a nullity.  Armour entitled to declaratory judgment with leave, if necessary, to pursue mandamus.  Counsel to be heard on costs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.            QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.