Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: Maritime Travel Inc. v. Go Travel Direct.Com Inc., 2008 NSSC 163

 

Date: 20080530

Docket: SH No. 192257

Registry: Halifax

 

Between:                   

Maritime Travel Inc., a body corporate

Plaintiff

and

 

Go Travel Direct.Com Inc., a body corporate

Defendant

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

Judge:             The Honourable Justice Suzanne M. Hood

 

Heard:                        January 28-31 and February 1, 2008, in Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Written Decision:       May 30, 2008

 

Subject:                       Competition Act, ss. 36(1) & 52; false or misleading advertising;          causation; burden of proof.

 

Summary:                   Maritime Travel commenced action against Go Travel Direct with respect to advertisements Go Travel Direct ran referring to Maritime Travel.  Maritime Travel says the ads are false or misleading under the Federal Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34 and seeks damages pursuant to that Act.

 

Issues:                        1.   Were the ads or any of them false or misleading in a material respect?

2.   If so, damages:

a)  from the entire advertising campaign by Go Travel Direct; or

b)  from any false or misleading ads.

 

Result:                        Ads in 2003 and 2005 not false or misleading in a material respect; ad in 2004 was.  Damages awarded for the latter.  Athey v. Leonati, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458, considered.

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.            QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.