Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: Economical Insurance Company v. Rushton, 2008 NSSC 237

 

Date: 20080805

Docket: SH 288743A

Registry: Halifax

 

Between:                            The Economical Insurance Company

                                                                                                                                               Applicant

 

v.

 

Lyndsay Janelle Rushton

Respondent

 

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

Judge:             The Honourable Justice Gerald R P Moir

 

Heard:                        24 June 2008 at Halifax

 

Subject:                       Small Claims Court appeal; standard of review

Insurance; Section B coverage; four year limit

 

Issue:                          (1) Standard of review.

(2) When are expenses “incurred” in the meaning of the temporal limit of the standard Section B terminology?

 

Summary:                   Insured followed course of physiotherapy at the IWK until she turned eighteen.  Physiotherapy remained necessary, but she had to obtain it outside the children’s hospital.  Before therapy resumed, the fourth anniversary of the accident passed.  The standard policy covers expenses “incurred” before the fourth anniversary.  An adjudicator allowed the insured’s claim.  He concluded that the ongoing physiotherapy expenses were “incurred” before the anniversary.

 

Result:                        (1) On a question of law, such as interpretation of a contract, the standard of review on a Small Claims Court appeal is correctness. 

(2) Early decisions interpreted “incurred” as making oneself liable for, but the weight of authority is now with a broader interpretation that captures expenses known with certainty to befall upon the insured.  The adjudicator correctly interpreted and applied the insurance contract.

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.            QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.