Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: CKF Inc v. Huhtamaki Americas Inc., 2009 NSSC 21

 

Date: 20090121

Docket: SH 298635

Registry: Halifax

Between:

 

CKF Inc.

Plaintiff/Respondent

v.

 

Huhtamaki Americas, Inc. and Huhtamaki Company Manufacturing

Defendant/Applicant

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

Judge:                   The Honourable Justice Frank Edwards

 

Heard:                  December 10, 2008, in Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Subject:                Motion to strike, CPR 14.25 (old Rules); Motion to transfer to Ontario and Maine, USA pursuant to Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act (proclaimed June 1, 2008) (“CJPTA”).

 

Issue:          1.  Whether “plain and obvious” that any part of Plaintiff’s statement of claim must fail;

 

2.  Whether Nova Scotia - not Ontario or Maine - is the more appropriate forum under the CJPTA.

 

Result:                  1.  No part of statement of claim “plain and obvious” to fail.

 

2.  Nova Scotia is the most appropriate forum under CJPTA.

 

Cases Noticed:      Huhtamaki Company Manufacturing v. CKF Inc., Recommended Decision on Motion to Dismiss and Order on Ancillary Motions of US Magistrate Judge Kravchuk, Case No. 1:08‑CV‑264‑JAW (D. Me. November 20, 2008);

 


Huhtamaki Company Manufacturing v. CKF Inc., Endorsement (at Case Conference), Court File No. 08‑CV‑042295 (Ont. Master, November 28, 2008);

 

Sable Mary Seismic Inc. v. Geophysical Service Inc., 2007 CarswellNS 559;

 

RIM v. Atari Inc., 2007 CanLII 33987 (Ont. S.C.);

 

Sullivan Entertainment Inc. v. Anne of Green Gables Licensing Authority, 2000 CanLII 16445 (F.C.);  

 

Astral Media Radio Inc. v. SOCAN, 2008 CarswellNat 3865 (F.C.);

 

Amchem Products Inc. v. British Columbia (1993)

 

Lloyd's Underwriters v. Cominco Ltd., 2007 CarswellBC 864;  leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted [2007] S.C.C.A. No. 322;

 

Purple Echo Productions Inc. v. KCTS Television, 2008 CarswellBC 337 (C.A.);

 

Fujitsu Consulting (Canada) Inc. v. Themis Program Management & Consulting Ltd., 2007 CarswellBC 2137 (S.C.);

 

Z.I. Pompey Industrie v. ECU‑Line N.V., [2003] 1 S.C.R. 450;

 

Columbia Pictures Industries v. Wang, 2007 CarswellSask 648 (C.A.);

 

Skyway Canada Ltd. v. Clara Industrial Services Ltd., 2005 CarswellOnt 5060;

 

Maritime Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. Pre Print Inc., 1996 CarswellNS 12 (C.A.);

 

Pro Swing Inc. v. ELTA Golf Inc., 2006 SCC 52;

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.