Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF Nova Scotia

Citation: Quadrangle Holdings Ltd. v. Coady Estate, 2016 NSSC 106

Date: 2016-04-18

Docket: Hfx No. 291455

Registry: Halifax

Between:

Quadrangle Holdings Ltd. v.

Plaintiff

v.

The Estate of Blair Coady, James Matheson, and Industrielle Alliance Valeurs Mobilières Inc.

Defendants

Library Heading

 

Judge:

The Honourable Justice James L. Chipman

Heard:

March 31 and April 1, 2016 in Halifax, Nova Scotia

Subject:

Summary judgment on the evidence as per the new Rule 13.

Summary:

Application by the Plaintiff for summary judgment on evidence in the action against the Defendant, The Estate of Blair Coady.

Issue:

On the evidence, is there a genuine issue of material fact for trial?

Result:

Held that with the advent of the new Rule 13 there is no longer a two-part test; however, the analytical framework outlined in Coady v. Burton Canada Co., 2013 NSCA 95, is essentially the same.

Determined that the Applicant met its burden as on the evidence there was no genuine material fact for trial.

Summary judgment granted in favor of the Plaintiff against the Defendant Estate with damages to be later assessed.

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.