Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: BC Rail Partnership  v. Standard Car Truck Company, 2009 NSSC 240

 

Date: 20090813

Docket:   Hfx No 220557

Registry: Halifax

 

 

Between:

BC Rail Partnership

Plaintiff

v.

 

Standard Car Truck Company, Trentonworks Limited

and Greenbrier Leasing Limited

Defendant

 

 

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

 

 

 

Judge:                         The Honourable Justice Gregory M. Warner

 

Heard:                                    June 11 and 15, 2009, in Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Subject:                                   Summary Judgment- 1972 Civil Procedure Rule 13.01 and 13.02

 

Summary:                               On December 10, 1999, a BC Rail train derailed near Pemberton, British Columbia, resulting in the loss of one life, damage to BC Rail’s track and equipment, loss of freight, and use of the track.  BC Rail claims that the derailment was caused by the improper design or manufacture of the stabilization system of the “truck” or undercarriage of one of the 155 new rail boxcars leased to it by Greenbrier Leasing Limited (“Greenbrier”) a few weeks before.  The fatal trip was the first using  the allegedly defective boxcar.

 

Issue:                                      Greenbrier applies for summary judgment under 1972 Civil Procedure Rule 13.01 and 13.02 on the basis that under the Lease:

i           BC Rail agreed to obtain insurance for the benefit of both it and Greenbrier and had no right of subrogation against Greenbrier; and,

ii           BC Rail expressly waived any possible claims against Greenbrier, including of the type advanced in this action.

 


Result:                                    On application of the principles of contract interpretation to the Lease, the Court determined that:  (1) interpreting the lease within its four corners, BC Rail’s claims were not barred; (2) it could not make a determination without resorting to extrinsic evidence that was in dispute, as to whether the insurance provision in the Lease precluded a right of subrogation.  A genuine issue existed.  Summary Judgment denied.

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.