Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY

Citation:   McCurdy (Re), 2006 NSSC 312

 

Date: October 18, 2006

Docket: B-28834

Registry: Halifax

 

 

District of Nova Scotia

Division No. 01 - Halifax

Court No. 28834

Estate No. 51-099835

 

In the Matter of the Bankruptcy of Stephen James McCurdy

 

__________________________________________________________________

 

A D D E N D U M

__________________________________________________________________

 

Registrar:               Richard W. Cregan, Q.C.

 

Case History:         Addendum to decision dated April 18, 2006

(2006 NSSC 125)

 

Heard:                   March 10, 2006

 

Present:                 Joseph A. Wilkie, CMA, CIRP, representing the

Trustee, WBLI Incorporated

 

Mike Chisholm representing the Office of the

Superintendent

 

 

 

 


 

 

[1]     I have reviewed my decision of April 18, 2006.  I think that statements made in paragraphs 12 and 13 are misleading.  By this addendum I wish to make correction.

 

[2]     I held that the Trustee should not have allowed the bankrupt  to stay in bankruptcy  beyond  the 21 months  provided  by the Superintendent’s Directive No. 12.    Rather he should have objected  to the discharge and promptly brought the matter before the court.

 

[3]     As it was not necessary  to the disposition of the case,  in paragraph 12  I said I was leaving  open the question of whether a trustee continues to have jurisdiction to grant a certificate of discharge after the 21 month period has passed.  What I said in paragraph 13 then suggests that the trustee may have such jurisdiction, if compliance with the conditional order is made  “shortly” after the 21 months has passed.

 

[4]     On careful reading of Directive No. 12 and particularly paragraph 5(2) thereof, it is clear that the authority given to a trustee to grant a discharge can only be exercised within the 21 month period.  Failure to comply with


 

 the conditional discharge within that time  necessitates a discharge application being made to the court.

 

R.

Halifax, Nova Scotia

October 18, 2006  

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.