Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: Vaughn v. Hayden, 2009 NSSC 235

Date: 20090717

Docket: Bwt No. 212166

Registry: Bridgewater

Between:

Donald Max Vaughn

Plaintiff

v.

 

Dr. David S. Hayden and Dr. David S. Hayden Inc., a body corporate,

incorporated under the laws of the Province of Nova Scotia

Defendants

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

Judge:         The Honourable Justice Glen G. McDougall

 

Heard:         June 11, 2009, in Bridgewater, Nova Scotia

 

Subject:       Summary Judgment on evidence pursuant to Civil Procedure Rule 13.04

 

Summary:   The plaintiff sued the defendant for complications arising from carpal tunnel release surgery.  Approximately one month after surgery the plaintiff had to be admitted to hospital for treatment of cerebral infection.  He alleged that the infection was caused by the defendants’ negligence.  The defendants obtained two experts’ reports which concluded that the plaintiff’s condition was not the result of any negligence on the part of the defendants.  The plaintiff did not have the opinion of an expert to support his allegations.

 

Issue: What is the applicable test on a motion for summary judgment under the new Civil Procedure Rule 13.04?

 


Result:        The new Rule on summary judgments has not altered the existing two-part test.  The initial burden is on the party advancing the motion to show that there is no genuine issue requiring trial.  It then falls to the opposing party to establish, on the facts that are not in dispute, that the claim has a real chance of success.  The pleadings only serve to indicate the laws and facts in issue.  The pleadings are not, per se, evidence.  A party who wishes to challenge the motion must present evidence by way of affidavit(s) or cross-examination or other means permitted by a judge.

 

The defendants succeeded by establishing that there was no genuine issue for trial.  The plaintiff failed to lead any evidence which would demonstrate a real chance of success.

 

The motion for summary judgment was granted dismissing the plaintiff’s claim.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.

QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.