Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

                          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

                   Citation:  Ofume v. CIBC Mortgages Inc., 2004 NSSC 266

 

                                                                                                     Date: 20040721

                                                                                         Docket:   S.H. 222298A

                                                                                                   Registry:  Halifax

 

 

 

Between:

                                                  Dr. Phillip Ofume

 

                                                                                                               Applicant

                                                             v.

 

 

                                  CIBC Mortgages Inc., a body corporate

                                                                                                            Respondent

 

 

                                                   D E C I S I O N

 

 

 

 

 

Judge:                            The Honourable Justice Walter R. E. Goodfellow

 

Heard:                            July 21, 2004, (in Chambers ) at Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Written Decision:  August 4, 2004

 

Counsel:                         Dr. Phillip Ofume, Personally, for the Applicant

Wayne J. Francis, for the Respondent            


By the Court:  (Orally)

 

[1]              Mr. Ofume, there are occasions when this court has the ability to change an Order of a fellow justice.  Obvious examples are matters of custody and access.  There is also a slip rule if there is a mistake in an Order.  But where an Order has been granted and as staff correctly told you, any remedy you have is one of Appeal and I cannot change an Order and the Orders I made today are subject to a very limited possible inherent jurisdiction.  The several Orders that you have seen me sign today, the only way they can change them is go to the Appeal Court and you have been told that. 

 

[2]              Of necessity, I find no basis in which to vary the Order of Justice Warner.

COSTS

 

[3]              Costs in the amount of $200.00 payable forthwith and I will wait for the Order.

 

J.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.