Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: E.B.F. Manufacturing Ltd.  v. White, 2009 NSSC 280

 

Date: 2009/09/21

Docket: Hfx 247580

Registry: Halifax

 

Between:

E.B.F. Manufacturing Limited and ElectroBraid Fence Limited

Plaintiffs

v.

 

Eric White and White Rhino Inc.

Defendants

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

Judge:                   The Honourable Justice Gerald R. P. Moir

 

Heard:                  22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30 April, 2009

 

Last

Submission: May 12, 2009

 

Subject:                Contracts, repudiation, fundamental breach; Patents, damages, loss of contribution

 

Summary:             The parties went through a trial in 2003, in which the issues were repudiation by E.B.F. of an exclusive licence agreement under which White granted an extensive licence to manufacture and sell electrified fencing invented and patented by White.  The court found there had been no repudiation.  Just the same, White went into competition.  In this trial, E.B.F. claimed damages for breach of the exclusive licence agreement by White.  White counterclaimed for a declaration that the agreement was terminated for repudiation or fundamental breach.

 

 

 


 

Issues:                   (1) Whether repudiation or fundamental breach had been established?

(2) If not, damages had to be assessed for White’s competition.    

 

Result:                  Further breaches since 2003 were insufficient to found repudiation or fundamental breach, and, in any case, White did not accept the repudiation or elect to treat the exclusive licence agreement as terminated.  Damages were assessed on the basis that E.B.F. lost a sale for each of White’s sales, and damages were assessed on the value each sale would have contributed to below the line expenses and profits, that is, E.B.F.’s actual gross profit per sale.

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.