Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                            SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

                         Citation: Chater et al v. Canada Lands Company, 2005 NSSC 37

 

                                                                                                                                  Date: 20050215

                                                                                                                          Docket: S.H. 204478

                                                                                                                                Registry:  Halifax

Between:

                                                    Elie Chater and Almon Investment

                                                                                                                           Plaintiffs/Respondents

                                                                            vs.

 

Canada Lands Company CLC Limited

                                                                                                                             Defendant/Applicant

 

                                                         LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

Judge:             The Honourable Justice Walter R.E. Goodfellow                      

Heard:                        February 15, 2005, in Halifax, Nova Scotia (Chambers)

 

Written Decision:       February 17, 2005      

 

Subject:                       Application to Strike - C.P.R. 14.25 and for Summary Judgment

 

Summary:                   Plaintiff met with representative of CLC and held discussions, inquiries etc. with regards to contaminated Gladstone Property which was subsequently placed on tender.  Plaintiff not successful tenderer, sued claiming contract, negligent misrepresentation, imparting of confidential information and unjust enrichment.

 

Issue:                          Do facts pleaded, taken as true, establish any cause of action?

 

Result:                        Mere intentions, negotiations, etc. pleaded, all subject to higher approval do not constitute a contract.  Allegations of a cause of action without facts pleaded to support such does not create a cause of action.  Plaintiffs’ claim struck.  If court had not struck claim it would have granted summary judgment.

 

Law settled - No precedent value.

 

 

            THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT’S DECISION.

                     QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.