Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                            SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

     Citation: Granite Environmental Inc. v. Nova Scotia (Labour Relations Board), 2004 NSSC 264

 

    Date: 20041216

                                                                                               Docket: SH 206862

                                                                                                   Registry:  Halifax

 

Between:

                                    Granite Environmental Incorporated

                                                                                                               Applicant

                                                             v.

 

                       Nova Scotia Labour Relations Board and International

Union of Operating Engineers Local 721

                                                                                                            Respondent

 

                                                                                                                                                           

                                                         LIBRARY HEADING

 

Judge:             The Honourable Justice Suzanne M. Hood

 

Heard:                        August 4, 2004

 

Written Decision:       December 16, 2004

 

Subject:                       Labour relations; certification under Part II, Trade Union Act

 

Summary:                   The Labour Relations Board (Construction Industry Panel) certified operating engineers employed by Granite Environmental Ltd.  Granite seeks to quash the decision.  The International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 721, opposes the application.

 

Issue:                          Should the decision of the Labour Relations Board (Construction Industry Panel) be set aside because it committed a reviewable error when: a) it included employees in a bargaining unit on the basis of spending the majority of the working day “on site” doing bargaining unit work; b) it excluded Wayne Best from the bargaining unit on the basis that he was a managerial employee; and c) it included Bob Dennis in the bargaining unit on the basis of that the majority of his working day was spent doing bargaining unit work?


- 2 -

 

 

Result:            a)      Patently unreasonable.  Result is almost absurd in that employee who spends only a small part of his or her working day doing construction industry work could be a member of a construction industry trade union.

 

b)      Not patently unreasonable.  There was evidence upon which Panel could conclude Best was a managerial employee.

 

c)      Patently unreasonable for 2 reasons:

 

(I)     as in (a) above; and

 

(ii)     there was no evidence upon which Panel could base its decision to add additional time to bargaining unit work.

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT’S DECISION

             QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.