Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY

Citation: Robie Financial Inc. v. Pye, 2009 NSSC 397

 

Date: December 22, 2009

          Docket: B 33527

Registry: Halifax

 

 

District of Nova Scotia

Division No. 01 - Halifax

Court No. 33527

Estate No. 51-1198349

 

Between:

 

Robie Financial Incorporated

Applicant

- and -

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc., Trustee in Bankruptcy of

Barry Kevin Pye

Respondent                                                                                         _________________________________________________________________

 

LIBRARY  HEADING                                          _________________________________________________________________

 

Registrar:              Richard W. Cregan, Q.C.                             

 

Heard:                  October 2, 2009                                                              

 

Written Decision: December 22, 2009

 


Summary:             The bankrupt had given security when purchasing an all terrain vehicle.  The vehicle being consumer goods and serial numbered goods, the financing statement was required to be registered under both the name registry and the serial number  registry.  It was, but the bankrupt’s name was not properly registered.  It omitted his middle name.  Such is required by the Regulations under the PPSA.

 

The Trustee took the position that for this reason the registration was defective and thus the security was not effective as against the Trustee.

 

The security holder argued that this defect was not seriously misleading as one would find the registration under the serial number registry.  In other words, it was asserting the dual search rule.

 

Result:                  It was held that the dual search rule does not apply in Nova Scotia.  Therefore the registration is defective.

 

The security holder also submitted that on the basis of promissory estoppel the Trustee should grant a release of its interest in the vehicle, notwithstanding the defective registration.  It was held that the necessary elements of promissory estoppel were not proved.

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT’S DECISION.

QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET .

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.