Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: Di-Anna Aqua Inc. v. Ocean Spar Technologies L.L.C., 2005 NSSC 354

 

Date: 20051229

Docket: ST 09193

Registry: Truro

 

Between:

Di-Anna Aqua Incorporated

Plaintiff

v.

 

Ocean Spar Technologies L.L.C. and

Net Systems Incorporated

Defendants

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

Judge:         The Honourable Justice Hilroy S. Nathanson

 

Heard:         November 23 and December 1, 2005, in Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Subject:       Conflict of Interest — Disqualification

 

Summary:   Bradley, of PricewaterhouseCoopers, retained as a prospective expert witness by the defendants, interviewed and hired Anthony, who, unbeknownst to Bradley, had co-authored a report with Raynard while working for Grant Thornton, retained as a prospective expert witness by the plaintiffs.              

 

Issue: Whether there exists a conflict of interest with respect to a prospective expert witness and his firm.

 

Result:        The test in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.) is discussed and applied.

 

The evidence is less than clear and convincing that all reasonable measures were taken in a timely manner to ensure that no disclosure occurred to one or more members of PricewaterhouseCoopers.  Bradley and the members of his firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers, were disqualified from acting as expert witnesses.

 

 

            THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.

                     QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.