Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                            SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

                                             Citation: Zinck v. Fraser, 2005 NSSC 152

 

                                                                                                                                  Date: 20050609

                                                                                                                Docket: SFHMCA 017647

                                                                                                                                Registry:  Halifax

 

Between:

                                                                    Crystal Zinck

                                                                                                                           Applicant/Respondent

                                                                             v.

                                                                    Steven Fraser

                                                                                                                           Respondent/Applicant

 

 

                                                         LIBRARY HEADING

 

Judge:             The Honourable Justice Moira C. Legere-Sers

 

Heard:                        May 10 & 11, 2005,  in Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Subject:                       Application to prohibit the removal of a child from Nova Scotia to Alberta

 

Summary:                   The parents of a  young child  have a contentious legal and personal history with unabated conflict.

This is the second attempt by the mother to move to Calgary with the child.  Custody has changed in the past from sole custody to the mother, supervised access to the father; to joint custody with extensive access to the father.  The issue of mobility was withdrawn by the mother leaving the custody application the sole issue to be decided.  The mother’s counsel argued that without the mobility issue the Court could not alter the status quo without a material change in circumstances.

 

Result:                        The joint custody order was a consent order.  The Court had not deliberated the issue of custody on the merits.  The consent order anticipated cooperation and facilitation of contact between child and parents.  The continuing conflict and instability as described in the evidence was sufficient to consider the competing parental plans.

The child was placed in the day-to-day care of the father.  The joint custody order was continued with access to the mother.  Both parents required to obtain parental instruction and appropriate supportive resources.

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.