Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: Andrist v. Andrist, 2011 NSSC 194

 

Date: 20110525

Docket: 1204-005025

Ken No. 064361

Registry: Kentville

 

 

Between:

 

Sharon Elaine Andrist

 

Petitioner

v.

 

Michael Douglas Andrist

 

Respondent

 

 

 

 

 

Judge:                            The Honourable Justice C. Richard Coughlan

 

Final Written                 

Submissions:                   April 15, 2011

 

Written Decision:  May 25, 2011

 

Counsel:                         Thomas R. MacEwan, for the Petitioner

Angela A. Walker and Brian F. Bailey, for the Respondent


Coughlan, J.:

 

[1]              In a decision issued March 3, 2011, I determined various issues concerning the division of matrimonial assets between Sharon Elaine Andrist and Michael Douglas Andrist.  I then set out a summary of the division of assets, repayment of maintenance made by Mr. Andrist and reimbursement of funds.  Subsequently, I received correspondence from Ms. Andrist’s counsel raising two issues concerning the summary.   Mr. Andrist’s counsel responded to the issues.

 

[2]              Firstly, the net proceeds of the sale of the matrimonial home was $106,236.46.  Mr. Andrist had taken $18,500.00 from the joint account in the parties’ names, which sum was to be reimbursed to Ms. Andrist.  If Mr. Andrist is credited with the $18,500.00, Ms. Andrist submits the amount of the proceeds of the matrimonial home to be credited to her in the division of assets should be reduced from $106,236.46 to $87,736.46 to account for the $18,500.00 Mr. Andrist had already received.  I agree.

 

[3]              Secondly, Ms. Andrist says the decision did not include reimbursement of the amount of spousal support paid directly to the Director of Maintenance Enforcement.   The decision did not deal with the spousal support collected by the Director of Maintenance Enforcement as it was dealt with by an order dated August 23, 2010.  The repayment of the amount of spousal maintenance paid directly to the Director of Maintenance Enforcement is in addition to any other equalization payment required to bring about an equal division of the matrimonial assets.

 

[4]              The following is a summary of the division of assets, excluding the repayment of the spousal support paid directly to the Director of Maintenance Enforcement, which is the subject of a separate order:


                                                     SUMMARY

                MATRIMONIAL ASSETS AND REPAYMENT OF FUNDS      

 

 

 

 

   Ms. Andrist

 

   Mr. Andrist

 

Matrimonial home, Centreville, Nova Scotia

(Net Proceeds $106,236.46 less money withdrawn from account by Mr. Andrist of $18,500.00)

 

     $87,736.46

 

 

 

Money withdrawn from Joint Account - May 8, 2009

 

 

 

     $18,500.00

 

Property, Big Island, Pictou County, Nova Scotia

 

 

 

       91,215.00

 

2002 Dodge Caravan                

 

         4,000.00

 

 

 

Smart Car

 

 

 

       15,000.00

 

Money paid to Mr. Andrist - August, 2008

 

 

 

         7,000.00

 

Reimbursement of maintenance paid directly to Ms. Andrist by Mr. Andrist, less mortgage overpayments and allowance re Mr. Andrist’s use of joint account

 

 

 

       24,389.52

 

 

 

                                   

 

 

 

 

 

Sub-Total

 

    $116,125.98

 

    $131,715.00

 

Equalization Payment

 

       $7,794.51

 

     ($7,794.51)

 

Total

 

    $123,920.49

 

    $123,920.49

 

 


 

[5]              Mr. Andrist is to pay to Ms. Andrist an equalization payment of $7,794.51. The amount of the spousal support paid directly to the Director of Maintenance Enforcement, which Ms. Andrist is to reimburse Mr. Andrist as a result of the order dated August 23, 2011, is to be set off against the equalization payment.

 

 

 

                                                                         _____________________________

Coughlan, J.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.