Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: R. v. Prest, 2011 NSSC 244

 

Date:  20110621

Docket:  Ken No. 345579

Registry:  Kentville

 

 

Between:

 

Todd Earle Prest                                                                             Appellant

 

and

 

Her Majesty the Queen                                                                Respondent

 

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

Judge:                        The Honourable Justice Gerald R. P. Moir

 

Heard:                       May 10, 2011

 

Subjects:                   Criminal law: provincial offences; strict liability, defence of due diligence, defence of officially induced error.

 

Summary:                 Mr. Prest was convicted of driving while suspended.  Unknown to him, the Registrar had suspended his licence after he pleaded guilty to driving without insurance.  The prosecutor had misinformed him and the Registrar's notice was waylaid.  The trial judge accepted Mr. Prest's evidence.  However, she determined that Mr. Prest's error was a mistake of law.  Therefore, she rejected a due diligence defence.

 

Issues:                        Whether Mr. Prest established the due diligence defence?  Alternatively, whether the evidence supported a defence of officially induced error, which had not been argued before the trial judge?

 

Result:                       Summary conviction appeal allowed.  The mistake was one of fact and the evidence supported both defences.

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.