Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

(FAMILY DIVISION)

Citation: Beaton v. MacNeil, 2011 NSSC 302

 

Date: 20110728

Docket: SFSNMCA65736

Registry: Sydney

Between:

 

Marlene Lucille Beaton

Applicant

v.

 

John Oswald MacNeil

Respondent

 

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

Judge:             The Honourable Justice Darryl W. Wilson

 

Heard:                        March 24-25, 2011, in Sydney, Nova Scotia

 

Last Post-Trial

Submissions:              April 14, 2011

 

Subject:                       Family Law

 

Summary/Issues:       Retroactive child maintenance - bankruptcy - declaration of ownership of property - resulting trust - unjust enrichment - constructive trust - return of personal property        

Result:            Retroactive child maintenance ordered.  (1)  Ms. Beaton is entitled to a declaration that she is the owner of 38 King Street.  (2)  Mr. MacNeil is entitled to a declaration that Ms. Beaton was holding 25 Queen Street in trust for him and the Trustee in Bankruptcy's title to 25 Queen Street is encumbered by Mr. MacNeil's resulting trust interest.  The Trustee is to convey 25 Queen Street to Mr. MacNeil and return the money Ms. Beaton paid to purchase 25 Queen Street to her.  Mr. MacNeil is to retain the rental income for 25 Queen Street and is responsible for all municipal taxes and water rates associated with the property.  (3)  Ms. Beaton has not established an unjust enrichment claim respecting the remaining assets being held by Mr. MacNeil.  (4)  Ms. Beaton is to transfer possession of, and her interest in, the 2007 Chrysler Sebring to Mr. MacNeil and sign the necessary documentation to effect such a transfer.  (5)  Ms. Beaton is to transfer possession of the baby barn, snowblower, lawnmower, furnace, tires and tools to Mr. MacNeil.           

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.