Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 2011 August 15

Docket: Hfx No. 339024

Probate Court File No. 58572

Registry: Halifax

 

 IN THE COURT OF PROBATE FOR NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: Komonen v. Fong, 2011 NSSC 315

 

 

                                                                                                                                                           

IN THE ESTATE OF DANNIE WING FONG, Deceased

 

Between:

 

SUSAN KOMONEN

Applicant

 

- and -

 

 

ANGELA FONG, LISA FONG, WENDY JONES OLSON, KIM JONES MURRAY, ARLENE FONG SKINNER, SARAH JANE FONG, DIANA FONG GOODWIN, SUSAN KOMONEN, KAREN ALI JEFFRY, JENNIFER JULIA FONG, DOW FONG, GEORGE FONG, JEAN FONG, KAY FONG ALI, ANN FONG JONES, WAYNE FONG, WILLIAM FONG, MON FONG, HELEN FONG AND DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY

Respondents

 

 

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

Judge: The Honourable Associate Chief Justice Deborah K. Smith

 

Heard:            June 1, 2011 in Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Subject:           Wills Act

 

Summary:       Dannie Wing Fong, a retired aeronautical engineer, died on May 28th, 2010 at the age of 85 years.  On November 12th, 1997, Mr. Fong executed a Will.  After his death a printed will form was found in his home.  Portions of this document had been filled out in pencil.  Portions of the document were left blank.  The document was signed in pencil but was not witnessed. Two different dates had been printed on the document (June 24th, 2009 and July, 2009).   A motion was brought pursuant to s. 8A of the Wills Act to determine the validity of the writing as a testamentary instrument.

 

 


 

 

Issue:              Whether the document in question is a testamentary instrument pursuant to s. 8A of the Wills Act?

 

 

Result:            The burden is on the Applicant to satisfy the Court, on a balance of probabilities, that the document in question embodies the testamentary intentions of the deceased.  This burden was not met in the circumstances of this case.  Accordingly, the motion was dismissed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.