Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: R. v. Boucher, 2011 NSSC 364

 

Date: 20111012

Docket: CRY. 348127

Registry: Yarmouth

Between:

Her Majesty the Queen

Plaintiff

- and -

 

Francis George Boucher

 

Respondent

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

Judge:         The Honourable JusticeA. David MacAdam

 

Heard:         September 15, 2011, in Sydney, Nova Scotia

 

Subject:       criminal law, arson for a fraudulent purpose, burden of proof, circumstantial evidence, evidence distinguished from speculation

 

Summary:   After a fire damaged his restaurant, the accused was charged with arson for a fraudulent purpose under s. 435(1) of the Criminal Code.  There was no dispute that the restaurant was damaged by fire, that the property was owned by the accused and insured under a policy issued to a limited company of which he was president, secretary and sole director.  It was also not disputed that the fire was deliberately set.  The only issue was whether the Crown had proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused set the fire.  There was no direct evidence linking the accused with the fire.

 

Issue: Had the Crown proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused set the fire in his restaurant?

 


Result:        The court reviewed the principles of the presumption of innocence and the requirement for proof beyond a reasonable doubt to found a conviction.  The evidence linking the accused to the fire was entirely circumstantial, and was not sufficient for a finding that the accused set the fire.  It could not be said that the circumstances were only consistent with his guilt and not with any other conclusion.

 

The accused was acquitted.

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.