Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

CitationNova Scotia (Attorney General) v. Russell, 2012 NSSC 251

 

Date: 20120725

Docket: BWT.370844

Registry: Bridgewater

 

 

 

Between:

 

The Attorney General of Nova Scotia,

representing her Majesty the Queen in the

Right of the Province of Nova Scotia

Appellant

 

v.

 

Cameron Wayne Russell

Respondent

 

 

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

 

 

Judge:                   The Honourable Justice C. Richard Coughlan

 

Subject:                Civil Law - Offences against public order - Weapons -

cancellation of  revocation of  Firearms License

 

Summary:             The Chief Firearms Officer for Nova Scotia revoked the

applicant’s Firearms Registration Certificate.  The applicant

applied to the Provincial Court for an order cancelling the                       revocation.  The Provincial Court Judge cancelled the                                      revocation.  The judge in interpreting s. 5(2) of the Firearms                       Act considered he was only permitted to look at the applicant’s

behaviour in the five years prior to the decision to revoke.  The

Crown appealed the cancellation of the revocation.

 


Issue:          Does Section 5(2) of the Firearms Act limited the scope of inquiry to the factors set out in the section?

 

Result:                 Section 5(2) of the Act requires a firearms officer, or a judge on a reference, to consider the enumerated factors which occurred in the previous five year period.  The firearms officer or judge is free to consider, in addition to the enumerated factors, other events or circumstances whether within or outside the five year period. As the judge did not consider evidence which he ought to have considered, a rehearing of the reference is required.

The appeal is allowed and remitted to the Provincial Court for

rehearing.

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.