Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

(FAMILY DIVISION)

Citation: Marchand v. Boudreau, 2013 NSSC 93

 

Date:20130312

Docket: SFPAMCA-068129

Registry: Port Hawkesbury

Between:

Betty Anne Marchand

Applicant

v.

 

Adrian Marchand

Respondent

                                                                             

LIBRARY HEADING

                                                                             

Judge:             The Honourable Justice Moira C. Legere Sers

 

Heard:                        December 7, 2012, in Port Hawkesbury, Nova Scotia

 

Subject:                      Shared Custody v. Joint Custody

 

Issue:                          Whether a shared parenting arrangement exists.  When a section 9 analysis                        under the child support guidelines is required.  What considerations apply.

 

Summary:                  The parents had a complex schedule due to both working shift work at the same location The father argued that this was a shared parenting arrangement.  The court ordered  joint custody , primary care with mother..

 

Result:                        This case started in January, 2010.   At the time of the order, this was a                            joint legal custody parenting strategy with primary care with the mother.                           The father has liberal parenting time depending on his shift schedule and                                       his ability to transport the child.

 

The schedule varied with the changing needs and availability of the                                    parents.  Between 2009 and 2012 this was not a share parent arrangement                                     calling for a section 9 analysis .Section 9 analysis done to cover the                                            subsequent schedule arising in the year 2012.

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.