Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

IN THE MATTER OF:                 The Estate of John Douglas Murray who died on November 9, 1997

 

 

- and -

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF:                 The Application of John Darrell Murray Executor and Beneficiary, Eunice Murray, Beneficiary, Helen Sherry, Beneficiary and Christine Mack, Beneficiary of the Estate of John Douglas Murray for the interpretation of the Will of John Douglas Murray pursuant to Section 153 (2) of the Probate Act, RSNS

 

 

 

JUSTICE  WALTER R.E. GOODFELLOW            HALIFAX, NS                         S.H. 163273

 

                                                            LIBRARY HEADING

                                          Cite as: Murray Estate (Re), 2000 NSSC 166

 

HEARD:        July 20, 2000

 

DECISION:    July 20, 2000 (Orally)                     WRITTEN RELEASE: August 11, 2000

 

SUBJECT:   Wills - Interpretation - Costs

 

SUMMARY:  Proctor entitled to solicitor and client costs payable by Estate Veniot v. Veniot Estate et al (1998), 167 N.S.R. (2d) 101.  The claimants denied solicitor and client costs with respect to party and party costs Tariff A may be utilized for Chambers matters Hi-Fi Novelty Co. Ltd. v. Attorney General of Nova Scotia (1993), 121 N.S.R. (2d) 63 and Keating v. Bragg, [1996] N.S.J. No. 554 confirmed on appeal (1997), 160 N.S.R. (2d) 363; however, it should only be used when a Chambers application is complex, lengthy  and approximates a trial.  This application was Special Time Chambers which commenced at 11:00 a.m. and concluded in the afternoon with the granting of an oral decision.

 

 

 

RESULT:      Claimants awarded party and party costs of $1,500.00 plus disbursements of $633.00.

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS COVER SHEET.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.