Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF Nova Scotia

Citation: Duncan v. Trisura Guarantee Insurance Company of Canada, 2018 NSSC 199

Date: 2018-05-16

Docket: Tru.  No.  450644

Registry: Truro

Between:

Gregory Duncan and James White

Applicants

and

Trisura Guarantee Insurance Company of Canada

 

Respondent

 

 

 

 

DECISION

COSTS ENDORSEMENT

 

 

Judge:

The Honourable Justice Jeffrey R. Hunt

 

 

Final Submissions on Costs:

Written Decision:

April 20, 2018

 

May 16, 2018

 

 

Counsel:

Ronald Chisholm, Solicitor for the Applicants

Gus Richardson Q.C., Solicitor for the Respondent

 


By the Court:

[1]              I have reviewed and considered the positions of the parties.  The path proposed by the Applicant would result in a cost figure of $34,750.00 - $49,750.00, plus disbursements.  The Respondent presents an analysis which would yield an award of $18,250.00, plus disbursements. 

[2]              This matter proceeded as an Application in Court.  The issue was obviously important to both parties.  It was a question and situation of some complexity.  The parties worked in a very professional fashion to ensure the hearing proceeded efficiently and within the time constraints as set.  In all, three Court days were required.

[3]              This proceeding does not fully determine the legal issues between the parties.  I do not conclude that it would be appropriate, in all the circumstances, to adopt $500,000.00 as the “amount involved” and proceed from that point.  To do so would be to pre-suppose the issues which may have to be determined in future.

[4]              I conclude that the appropriate step at this point would be to set an amount involved of $150,000.00 and assess costs on that basis together with the per diem and disbursements.  This figure is partially derived from a reasonable estimate of the legal defence costs which may be anticipated but perhaps, even more directly, it is drawn from an attempt to assess what figure would do justice between the parties.

[5]              These issues were important to the Applicants.  Given this importance a robust case was mounted.  This was reasonable given the stakes. Adopting an amount of $150,000.00, the tariff yields the following figures:

 

                        $ 16,750.00               (Scale 2)

                           6,000.00                  (Per Diem)

                        ___________

                        $22,750.00

 

 

[6]              The parties have advised the Court they were successful in agreeing on the disbursement amount.  This has been agreed to be $4,913.03.   Accordingly, costs are assessed at $22,750.00 with disbursements of $4,913.03.

 

 

                                                                                    J.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.