Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

                              SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

                               Citation: Balser v. Wiles, 2013 NSSC 278

 

Date: 20130205

Docket: Ann No. 407756

Registry: Annapolis Royal

 

 

Eleanor W.  Balser

Plaintiff

v.

 

Tara L.  Wiles, Joseph Reginald Peck

Defendant

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

Judge:                            The Honourable Justice John D.  Murphy

 

Heard:                           February 5, 2013 in Annapolis Royal, Nova Scotia

 

Written Decision: September 10, 2013

{Oral decision rendered February 5, 2013}          

 

Subject:      Real property, boundary dispute, adverse possession, easement

 

Summary:   Adjacent property owners disputed title to a 12-foot strip of land.  Applicant's predecessor to title had built a garage extending six feet onto the disputed strip, and the remaining six feet served as the Respondents driveway.  By previous oral decision court found that the Respondents had valid legal title to the land, but the Applicant had established possessory title to the six feet upon which part of the garage was built.

 

Issue: Is the Applicant entitled to possession of or access to a portion of the remaining six feet in order to maintain the garage?

 


Result:        Although the Applicant's use of the land adjacent to the garage was not of the continuous and exclusive nature required to establish possessory title, entries to construct and maintain the garage including painting, shingling, repairing and grass mowing were sufficient to create an easement in the form of a right‑of‑way.

 

The right‑of‑way width was fixed at four feet, a distance that corresponded to the county set back requirement from a property line for a garage, and that would allow adequate room for maintenance.  Use of the easement was limited to performing reasonable maintenance and repair to the garage after providing 24‑hour notice to Respondents.

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.