Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: Dataville Farms Ltd. v. Colchester County (Municipality), 2013 NSSC 355

 

Date: 20131114

Docket: Hfx No. 416566

Registry: Halifax

 

 

Between:

Dataville Farms Ltd.

Applicant

v.

 

Municipality of the County of Colchester

                                                                                                           Respondent

 

                                  Jonathan Bahai (aka Jonathan Tranter

                                    dba Server Balance Data Solutions)

                                                                                                           Respondent

 

 

                                                         - and -                                                        

 

                                                                                      Docket:  Hfx No. 417390

                                                                                                 Registry:  Halifax

 

Between:

 

                                                  Jonathan Bahai

                                                                                                              Applicant

 

                                                             v.

 

                               Municipality of the County of Colchester

                                                                                                           Respondent

 

 

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

 


 

Judge:                            The Honourable Justice Michael J. Wood

 

Heard:                            October 17, 2013 in Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Written Decision: November 14, 2013        

 

Subject:                          Municipal Government Act - Tax Sales          

 

Summary:                      Dataville Farms Ltd. wanted to redeem properties which had been sold by Colchester at tax sale.  Dataville did not deliver payment prior to closing of the municipal office on the last day of the redemption period.  It claimed that Colchester acted unreasonably and thwarted the redemption efforts.

 

Issue:                    When does the redemption period expire?

 

Did Datavilles efforts amount to redemption?

 

Result:                           Contrary to the position of Colchester, the redemption period under the Municipal Government Act expires at midnight six months after the tax sale and not at 4:30 when the administrative offices closed.  The allegedly unreasonable conduct by Colchester in dealing with Dataville was not relevant in determining whether redemption took place within the statutory period.  Since the payment was not made by Dataville within six months from the tax sale, the right to redeem was lost.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.