Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: MacDonnell v. MacDonnell, 2005 NSSC 182

 

Date: 20050627

Docket: S.T. 1207-002579 (032879)

Registry: Truro

Between:

Gerald Michael MacDonnell

Petitioner

v.

 

Michelle Christine MacDonnell

Respondent

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

Judge:             The Honourable Justice Walter R.E. Goodfellow

 

Heard:                        June 6, 2005 in Truro, Nova Scotia

June 27, 2005 in Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Written Decision:      June 28, 2005

 

Subject:                      Validity of marriage/reconciliation contract  

 

Summary:                  The parties commenced cohabitation in 1987 - two children, the first born 1988, the second child in 1991.  The parties married October 21, 1993 and separated briefly January 1997.  Separation agreement turned into a marriage/  reconciliation contract followed by further cohabitation to February 2004.  The separation agreement term providing lump sum of $10,000 to Mrs. MacDonnell in return for deed to matrimonial home incorporated in marriage/reconciliation contract and equity in matrimonial home at the time of final separation in excess of $100,000. Although Mrs. MacDonnell had independent advice recommending against execution of the agreement she did so however as only issue outstanding a property matter test to be applied is s. 29 of the Matrimonial Property Act

 

Issue:                          Was the marriage/reconciliation contract valid?

 

Result:                        Desperation on behalf of Mrs. MacDonnell to have children returned to the matrimonial home, non-disclosure, no negotiations, vulnerability of Mrs. MacDonnell results in marriage contract/reconciliation agreement being held invalid.

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION           QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.