Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

FAMILY DIVISION

          Citation: Nova Scotia (Community Services)  v. S.L., 2005 NSSC 79

 

                                                                                                     Date: 20050414

                                                                                  Docket: S.F.H. CFSA 29474

                                                                                                 Registry:  Halifax

Between:

                                      Minister of Community Services

                                                                                                              Applicant

                                                             v.

 

                                                S. L. and A. M. G.

                                                                                                          Respondents

 

 

                                     Editorial Notice

 

Identifying information has been removed from this electronic version of the library sheet.

 

Restriction on

publication: There is a restriction on publication pursuant to s. 94 (1) Children and Family Services Act.

 

Judge:                  The Honourable Justice Leslie Dellapinna             

 

Heard:                  April 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, 2005 in Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Written Decision: April 14, 2005                

 

          Subject:      A permanent care application pursuant to the provisions of the Children and Family Services Act.

 

Summary:        The Minister of Community Services sought an order for the permanent care and custody of the Respondents twenty-three month old son.  The child had special needs.

 

Issue:               Should permanent care be granted to the Minister and if so should there be a provision for access?

 


Result:             Permanent care was granted with no provision for access. The Respondents were unable to meet the needs of the child and if placed in their care he would be subject to an unacceptable risk of harm.  Access was not considered to be in the best interests of the child and the requirements set out in the Act before an order for access could be granted were not satisfied.

 

 

This information sheet does not form part of the courts judgment.  Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.