Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF Nova Scotia

FAMILY DIVISION

Citation: Abbott v. Abbott, 2014 NSSC 229

Date: 2014-06-19

Docket: No. 1201-66344

Registry: Halifax

Between:

Warren Burton Abbott

Petitioner

v.

Angela Marie Abbott

Respondent

 

Judge:

The Honourable Justice Deborah Gass

Heard:

April 14, 17 & 25, 2014, in Halifax, Nova Scotia

Written Costs Submissions:

May 1 & 26, 2014

Counsel:    

Warren Burton Abbott, Petitioner

Tanya G. Nicholson, counsel for Respondent

           

 


By the Court:

[1]             In this proceeding both parties claim costs against the other.  The court has received written submissions supporting their respective positions.

[2]             I do not propose to recite the oft cited case law and Civil Procedure Rules which are relevant to this phase of the proceedings.

[3]             The main issue before the court was the claim by Mr. Abbott for one half of what he asserted was matrimonial debt.

[4]             The court resolved that issue in favour of Ms. Abbott.

[5]             The value of the matrimonial home was in issue, but no evidence to support a greater value than that put forward by Ms. Abbott with the supporting evidence she provided, was presented.

[6]             A third issue was spousal support wherein Mr. Abbott sought a termination of his obligation.  Although no termination date was ordered, the spousal support order was reduced by $200.00.

[7]             It is correct, as Mr. Abbott argues, that the issue of determining whether certain debts were matrimonial, is a reasonably justiciable issue and was therefore not a frivolous claim.  Mr. Abbott himself incurred costs in this proceeding as well.

[8]             However, Ms. Abbott was the substantially successful party, and as such is entitled to costs.  Given all of the circumstances I find that costs of $4,000.00 are in order.  These costs, together with the previous costs order o $200.00 ($4,200.00) shall be deducted from the equity owed to Mr. Abbott from the property division.

 

Gass, J.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.