Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation:  Thornton v. RBC General Insurance Company, 2014 NSSC 215

 

Date: 20140702

Docket: Hfx No. 290563

Registry: Halifax

 

Between:

 

                                                   John Thornton

 

                                                                                                                 Plaintiff

 

                                                             v.

 

                            RBC General Insurance Company/Compagnie

                                          dAssurance Generale RBC

 

                                                                                                             Defendant

 

 

 

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

 

Judge:                            The Honourable Justice Michael J. Wood

 

Heard:                            March 13, 2014 (in Chambers), in Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Written Decision: July 2, 2014

 

Subject:                          Civil Procedure - Renewal of Notice of Action

 

Civil Procedure - Amendment of Pleadings

 

Limitation of Actions - Disability Insurance

 

 

 

 


 

Summary:                      Plaintiff made a claim for disability payments which was denied in 1998.  In 2008, he commenced legal proceedings against insurer.  In 2012, defendant served with notice of action.  Plaintiff made motion to renew notice of action and statement of claim and to amend to replace named defendant with proper party.  Defendant made motion for summary judgment on evidence.

 

Issue:                    Should renewal be granted?

 

Should amendment be permitted?

 

Should summary judgment be granted?

 

Result:                           Court concluded that in the absence of evidence showing that failure to serve due to inadvertence and that defendant not prejudiced, renewal not granted.  The limitation period for the disability claim had expired.  Court rejected argument that it was a rolling limitation which was refreshed each month by non-payment of benefits.  Because of expired limitation motion to amend dismissed.  Result of motions being dismissed was that plaintiffs action must fail and defendants summary judgment motion granted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.