Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

(FAMILY DIVISION)

Citation: Nova Scotia (Community Services) v. T.L.M., 2005 NSSC 112

 

Date: 20050401

Docket: SFHC-37194

Registry: Halifax

 

Between:

Minister of Community Services

Applicant

v.

 

T. L. M.,

R. H. a.k.a. R. M. and

W. G. R.

Respondents

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

                                                         Editorial Notice

 

Identifying information has been removed from this electronic version of the library sheet.

 

Restriction on publication:

 

Publishers of this case please take note that s. 94(1) of the Children and Family Services Act applies and may require editing of this judgment or its heading before publication.  Section 94(1) provides:

 

“No person shall publish or make public information that has the effect of identifying a child who is a witness at or a participant in a hearing or the subject of a proceeding pursuant to this Act, or a parent or guardian, a foster parent or relative of the child.”

 

Publishers of this case further take note that in accordance with s. 94(2) no person shall publish any information relating to the custody, health and welfare of the children.

 

Judge:                         The Honourable Justice R. James Williams

 

Heard:                                    April 1, 2005, in Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Oral Decision:                        April 1, 2005

 


Edited/Released:                    May 10, 2005

 

Summary:                              Children found in need of protective services pursuant to s. 22(2) of the Children and Family Services Act.

 

Issue:                                                                                 See above.

 

Result:                                                      See above.

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.