Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: Pink v. Lohnes-Davis, 2014 NSSC 304

 

 

 

 

 Date: 20140822

Docket: Bwt. 333895

Registry: Bridgewater

 

 

Between:

Joan E. Pink

 

Plaintiff

- and -

 

 

June M. Lohnes-Davis and Allan N. Davis

 

Defendants

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                           

LIBRARY SHEET

 

 

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT:    Real Property - Title - Boundaries - Determination of Boundary

Real Property - Easements, Licences and Prescriptive Rights - Use of Right of Way - Interference with Right of Way

 

 


SUMMARY: The plaintiff owned land the western boundary of which was the edge of a Right of Way.  The plaintiff renovated the cottage on the land.  A dispute arose as to the location of the boundary.  The owners of the Right of Way disputed the use made of the Right of Way by the plaintiff.  The defendants erected a fence along the Right of Way adjacent to the plaintiff’s cottage.  The plaintiff claimed the defendants interfered with her use of the Right of Way and sought damages.

 

The defendants seek an injunction to stop the plaintiff from using their property for more than ingress and egress and damages for emotional stress, trespass and interference with their property.

 

ISSUES:         What is the location of the boundary between the properties?  What is the extent of the plaintiff’s Right of Way and did the defendants interfere with the plaintiff’s use? Are the defendants entitled to damages for trespass and interference with the use of their property?

 

RESULT:      The boundary as surveyed by the plaintiff’s surveyor is the boundary line between the properties.  The Right of Way is much broader than the right of ingress and egress.  The plaintiff has the same rights as the owner of the servient tenement.  The defendants interfered with the plaintiff’s use of the Right of Way and are to remove the fence along the edge of the Right of Way and pay damages to the plaintiff. The defendants’ claim for emotional stress, trespass and interference with the enjoyment of their property is dismissed as are the other claims of the defendants.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.