Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
Citation: R v. Taweel, 2014 NSSC 310
Date: 20140814
Docket: CRH No. 410910
Registry: Sydney
Between:
Her Majesty the Queen
v.
Stephen Nicholas Taweel
Library Heading
Judge: |
The Honourable Justice Patrick J. Murray |
Heard: Oral Decision: |
August 14, 2014, in Halifax, Nova Scotia August 14, 2014, in Halifax, Nova Scotia |
Written Decision: |
August 27, 2014, in Sydney, Nova Scotia |
Subject: |
Sentencing.
|
Summary: |
The Accused, age 55, a first time offender was convicted of sexual assault contrary to section 271 of the Criminal Code of Canada. The Accused had a positive Pre-Sentence Report and standing in the community. Accused was assessed a low risk to reoffend. |
Issue: |
What is a fit and proper sentence? |
Result: |
Applying principles of sentencing Accused received a sentence of 28 months imprisonment. Conditional Sentence rejected as circumstances called for federal term of imprisonment. Denunciation and deterrence were primary sentencing objectives. Aggravating factors included circumstances of the offence.
|
Cases cited: |
Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C., c. C-46; R v. Proulx, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 61; R v. W. (L.F.), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 132; R. v. Morine, 2011 N.S.S.C 46; R. v. Ruzic, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 687; R. v. Chaulk, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; R. v. H.S., 2014 ONCA 323; R. v E.(M.W.), 2009 NSPC 65, 2011 NSCA 87; R. v. Oliver, 2007 NSCA 15; R. v. Gordon, 1984 CanLII 2564; R. v. Cromwell, 2005 NSCA 137; R. v. W. (J.J.), 2012 NSCA 96; R. v. Weaver, 120 N.S.R. (2d) 66; R. v. A. (W.H.), 2011 NSSC 246; R. v. Pomerleau, 2009 ONCJ 189; R. v. Bradley, 2008 ONCA 179; R. v. F. (G.C.), [2004] O.J. No. 3177, (ONCA); R. v. C.K.H, [1998] N.S.J. No. 520; R. v. Winters, [1999] N.S.J. No. 49; R. v. A.C., 2011 ONSC 4389; R. v. MacLachlin, 2013 SKQB 332; R. v. Mehanmal, 2012 ONCJ 681; Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982, R.S.C. 1985; R. v. S.C.C., 2004 NSPC 41; R. v. P.E.S., [2000] N.S.J. No. 341; R. v. Nowe, 2004 NSCA 137; R. v. G.A.L., 2001 NSCA 29; R. v. Taweel, 2014 NSSC 103;
|
THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION. QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.