Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

                                     IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

                                  Citation: Amos & Andy v. Henneberry, 2003 NSSC 144

                                                                                                                                   Date:20030506

                                                                                                                            Docket: SH 179867

                                                                                                                                Registry:  Halifax

Between:

                                                     Amos and Andy Fisheries Limited

                                                                                                                                                 Plaintiff

                                                                             v.

 

                                                                Robert Henneberry

                                                                                                                                          Respondent

 

                                                            LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

Judge:                       The Honourable Justice John D. Murphy

 

Heard:                       May 6th,  2003 in Halifax

 

 

Written Decision:   July 4, 2003                          

 

Subject:        Injunction - Defendants claim for damages. 

 

Summary:    Plaintiff obtained injunction preventing Defendant from completing sale of fishing rights to which Plaintiff claimed entitlement.  After an arbitrator determined rights belonged exclusively to Defendant, the Defendant sought damages against Plaintiff on basis that issuance of injunction caused Defendant to suffer damages resulting from lost sale.

 

Issue:                        Is Defendant entitled to damages resulting from injunction prohibiting sale of his fishing rights?

 

Result:          Defendants claim for damages dismissed.  Defendant did not establish on the balance of probabilities that he suffered damages.  There was no evidence that the fishing rights retained by the Defendant when the injunction stopped the sale were worth any less than the amount which the Defendant would have recovered if the enjoined sale had proceeded.

 

The Defendants claim to recover costs incurred during arbitration was dismissed in the context of the present application because the issues in the arbitration did not necessarily arise as a result of the injunction.

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.