Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

 Cite as: SNE Corporation v. Kim, 2008  NSSC 48

 

Date: 20080128

Docket: 290112

Registry: Sydney

 

Between:                                                             

                            SNE Corporation, a body corporate under the laws of Korea; and

                SNE Sea Products Incorporated; a body corporate under the laws of Nova Scotia

Planintiffs

v.

 

Yong Take Kim, Nam-HWA Lee and Shin Han F & P Inc., a body corporate under the laws of Nova Scotia

Defendants

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

Judge:                          The Honourable Justice Walter R.E. Goodfellow

 

Heard:              January 28, 2008 in Sydney, Nova Scotia

 

Written Decision:         February 18, 2008 (Oral decision rendered January 28, 2008)

 

Subject:                        Publication Ban

 

Summary:                    Plaintiffs filed for a permanent injunction seeking the removal of the defendants from the premises said to be owned by the plaintiffs, a fish plant etc. in Louisbourg, Nova Scotia and enjoining the defendants from the operation of such

 

Issue:                           Should a publication ban be granted?                                           

 

Result:                         The law is well settled. The test is set out in Dagenias v. C.B.C.  1994 S.C.R. 835 as elaborated on by the Supreme Court of Canada in Sierra Club of Canada v. Canada (Minister of Finance) 2002 2 S.C.R. 522.  Application fails to disclose a real and substantial risk.  Information provided in a public domain that which you would normally expect in any civil dispute.  No important commercial interest established that goes beyond the specific interest of the parties and court not satisfied that the beneficial effect of a publication ban would outweigh it’s adverse impact on the open court principle.  Application dismissed.

 

            THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.            QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.