Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation:  Western Electrics Ltd. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 625, 2004 NSSC 129

 

                                                                                                                                Date:  20040624

                                                                                                                        Docket:  S.H. 207988

                                                                                                                              Registry:  Halifax

Between:

                                                         Western Electrics Limited

                                                                                                                                            Applicant

                                                                         - and -

 

The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers,

Local 625 (the “Union)

                                                                                                                                         Respondent

                                                                LIBRARY HEADING

 

Judge:             The Honourable Justice Suzanne M. Hood

 

Heard:                        May 11, 2004 in Chambers, at Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Written Decision:      June 24, 2004

 

Subject:                      Trade Union Act; certiorari; Rule 56.06(1); Rule 3.03; Rule 2.02.   

 

Summary:                  A unionized employer sub-contracted work to a non-union employer.  The employer had a collective bargaining relationship with I.B.E.W., Local 625 under Part II of the Trade Union Act.  The Union filed a grievance which went to arbitration.  The Employer applied for judicial review of the arbitration award pursuant to the Arbitration Act.

 

Issue:                          What is the proper form of judicial review where the parties are involved                           in the construction industry?

 

Result:                        S. 107 of the Trade Union Act mandates an application in the nature of                              certiorari where the dispute is with respect to a collective agreement in the                                    construction industry.  There is no alternative procedure of consensual                               arbitration under the collective agreement in such cases. 

 

The time limit for filing an application in the nature of certiorari has expired.  The court should not exercise its inherent jurisdiction to extend the time for filing of the application because of the wording of Rule 56.06(1).  It provides that Rule 3.03, which allows for extensions of time, does not apply.  Nor can Rule 2.02 override the specific wording of Rule 56.06(1)

 

 

                      THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURTS DECISION.


                                  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.