Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

CASE NO.                                      VOL. NO.

 

CANADA

PROVINCE OF NOVA SCOTIA                                                               

 

                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

 

 

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

 

                                                                                                                                                           

- against -

 

 

FREDERICK WILLIAM LOGAN BLACK

 

 

                                                                                               

 

 Justice John D. Murphy          Halifax, Nova Scotia                          Cr. No.  145665

 

 

                                                         LIBRARY HEADING

                       [Cite as R.  v. Black, 2002 NSSC  26 ]

 

 

HEARD:        in Halifax, Nova Scotia, on December 4, 2001

 

DECISION:   December 4, 2001, Orally.

 

SUBJECT:   Criminal Law - Charter Motion, Application to quash subpoena

 

SUMMARY:  Accused, charged with fraud contrary to s. 380(1)(a) of Criminal Code, brought motions to stay charges on basis that his rights under Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms were violated during investigations by RCMP and/or Office of Superintendent of Bankruptcy (“OSB”).  Accused subpoenaed former Superintendent of Bankruptcy,  who applied to quash subpoena. 

 

ISSUE:          Whether accused met burden of establishing on balance of probabilities that person subpoenaed likely to give material, relevant evidence.

 

RESULT:      Subpoena was quashed.

 


Other personnel from OSB had testified concerning any relevant activities at that Office, and had been examined concerning documents generated there.  The involvement of OSB in all matters relevant to the issues arising from the Charter motions can be assessed without the attendance of the former Superintendent.  Accused did not establish that the former Superintendent is likely to be able to provide material or relevant evidence with respect to issues raised by the motions.

 

If a proportionality test were applied, the difficulties related to bringing the witness, who had not been associated with OSB for several years,  who would have to review documents already thoroughly canvassed by other witnesses, and who would have to travel from Ottawa to Halifax, substantially outweigh any very marginal benefit which might result from his testifying.

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS COVER SHEET.

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.