Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

Nova Scotia Court of Appeal

Citation: R. v. P.B.T.K., 2015 NSCA 57

Date: 20150612

Docket: CAC 436531

Registry: Halifax

Between:

P.B.T.K.

Appellant

v.

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

 

Judges:

Beveridge, Bryson and Bourgeois, JJ.A.

 

Appeal Heard:

June 11, 2015, in Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Written Release

June 12, 2015

 

Held:

Appeal allowed, per reasons for judgment of the Court

 

Counsel:

Alan G. Ferrier, Q.C. for the appellant

William Delaney, Q.C. for the respondent

 

 

 

 


By the Court (orally):

[1]             The appellant was convicted in Provincial Court of possession of child pornography contrary to s. 163.1(4) of the Criminal Code

[2]             The only issue at trial was whether the Crown had proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant was in possession of the computer files that contained the prohibited material.  The case against the appellant was circumstantial and depended on establishing that he had exclusive access to a particular piece of computer equipment. 

[3]             The appellant argues that the trial judge misapprehended the evidence set out in an Agreed Statement of Fact and a key witness about details in that agreed statement.

[4]             The Crown concedes that the trial judge did misapprehend this evidence and that the misapprehension led to a verdict that was unreasonable or unsupported by the evidence.


[5]             The only appropriate remedy where a verdict is unreasonable or unsupported by the evidence is to quash the conviction and enter an acquittal.  Accordingly, the conviction is quashed and an acquittal is entered.

 

Beveridge, J.A.

Bryson, J.A.

Bourgeois, J.A.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.