METROPOLITAN ENTERTAINMENT - and - ANGELA DURNFORD, THE
GROUP, (Workers’ Compensation Board NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS’
Claim No. 1656602) COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL and THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION BOARD OF NOVA SCOTIA
(Appellant) (Respondents)
CA161356 Halifax, N.S. Freeman, J.A.
[Cite as: Metropolitan Entertainment Group v. Durnford, 2000 NSCA 122]
APPEAL HEARD: September 25, 2000
JUDGMENT DELIVERED: October 26, 2000
SUBJECT: Workers’ Compensation, epicondylitis, causation, deference
SUMMARY: The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Tribunal found epicondylitis (tennis elbow) aggravated by the repetitive motion of dealing blackjack in a casino to be a compensable workplace injury, reversing the Workers’ Compensation Board. The employer appealed.
ISSUE: Did the Appeals Tribunal owe deference to the hearing officer’s conclusions respecting expert evidence that causation was not established to a scientific standard?
RESULT: The appeal was dismissed. Section 246 of the Workers’ Compensation Act requires an independent adjudication by the Tribunal, which must defer to the hearing officer only with respect to advantages enjoyed by the hearing officer in the fact-finding process. The Act establishes standards for entitlement to benefit which are not scientific standards of causation.
This information sheet does not form part of the court’s judgment. Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet. The full court judgment consists of 14 pages. |