Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 19980615                                                                                Docket: CA 142159

 

 

 

 

                                              NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

 

                                        Cite as: Hosain v. Rahman, 1998 NSCA 102

 

                                           Roscoe, Pugsley and Bateman, JJ.A.

 

 

 

 

BETWEEN:                                                                                      )

)

KHADIM HOSAIN and KHALIDA HOSAIN                                    )           Jill Graham-Scanlan

)           for the Appellants

Appellants                  )

)

- and -                                                                                                )

)

ABDUL RAHMAN and SHAKILA RAHMAN                                 )           Elizabeth Van den Eynden

)           for the Respondents

Respondents )

)

)

)

)

)           Appeal Heard:

)           June 15, 1998

)

)

)           Judgment Delivered:

)           June 15, 1998

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE COURT:           Leave to appeal is granted, but the appeal is dismissed with costs awarded in the amount of $700.00 including disbursements as per oral reasons for judgment of Roscoe, J.A.; Pugsley and Bateman, JJ.A., concurring.

 


 

 

 

The reasons for judgment of the Court were delivered orally by:

 

ROSCOE, J.A.:                   

 

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order denying the appellants costs after a successful Chambers application.  Justice Hood granted the application of the appellants and found the respondents in contempt of court for failing to comply with the terms of an arbitrator’s award which had been made an order of the court.  The effective date of the contempt order was delayed in order to give the respondents ample time to comply with the terms of the order which Justice Hood found was ambiguous. On the matter of costs the learned Chambers judge said:

...I am going to exercise my discretion to award no costs. I hope we have achieved a result here which will end this matter, and I think an award of costs might have a counterproductive effect, and so I decline to award costs, I guess, with some misgivings.

 

Costs are  discretionary, and  the Chambers  judge exercised no wrong principle in declining to award them. We would therefore not interfere with the decision.

                        Leave to appeal is granted, but the appeal is dismissed with costs in the amount of $700.00 including disbursements.

 

 

Roscoe, J.A.

Concurred in:

Pugsley, J.A.

Bateman, J.A.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.