CASE NO. VOLUME PAGE
H. (N.M.), a young offender HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
- and -
(Appellant) (Respondent)
C.A.C. No. 160162 Halifax, N.S. Glube, C.J.N.S.
(orally)
[Cite as R. v. N.M.H., 2000 NSCA 109]
APPEAL HEARD: October 3, 2000
JUDGMENT DELIVERED: October 3, 2000
WRITTEN RELEASE OF ORAL: October 5, 2000
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF CONVICTION
SUMMARY: N.M.H. convicted as a party of robbery with violence. She gave information to two youths who on that basis committed a home robbery. Although they anticipated finding a large sum of money, less than $100.00 was found, which they did not split with N.M.H. The two youths plead guilty and testified against N.M.H.
ISSUE: Was the verdict unreasonable. Was there a miscarriage of justice.
RESULT: After making findings of credibility of facts, the trial judge does not have to address and resolve each and every inconsistency in the evidence of the two youths. (See: R. v. Burns (1994), 89 C.C.C. (3d) 193.)
Verdict not unreasonable and no miscarriage of justice.
Appeal dismissed.
|
This information sheet does not form part of the Court's judgment. Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet. The full court judgment consists of 6 pages.
|