CASE NO. VOLUME PAGE
H. (N.M.), a young offender HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
- and -
(Appellant) (Respondent)
C.A.C. No. 160162 Halifax, N.S. Glube, C.J.N.S.
(orally)
[Cite as R. v. N.M.H., 2000 NSCA 109]
APPEAL HEARD: October 3, 2000
JUDGMENT DELIVERED: October 3, 2000
WRITTEN RELEASE OF ORAL: October 5, 2000
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF CONVICTION
SUMMARY: N.M.H. convicted as a party of robbery with violence. She gave information to two youths who on that basis committed a home robbery. Although they anticipated finding a large sum of money, less than $100.00 was found, which they did not split with N.M.H. The two youths plead guilty and testified against N.M.H.
ISSUE: Was the verdict unreasonable. Was there a miscarriage of justice.
RESULT: After making findings of credibility of facts, the trial judge does not have to address and resolve each and every inconsistency in the evidence of the two youths. (See: R. v. Burns (1994), 89 C.C.C. (3d) 193.)
Verdict not unreasonable and no miscarriage of justice.
Appeal dismissed.
This information sheet does not form part of the Court's judgment. Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet. The full court judgment consists of 6 pages.
|