Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

                           NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL

             Citation: A.M. v. Childrens Aid Society of Cape Breton-Victoria,

                                                   2005 NSCA 58

 

                                                                                                     Date: 20050407

                                                                                               Docket: CA 236563

                                                                                                 Registry:  Halifax

 

 

Between:

                                                           A.M.

                                                                                                              Appellant

                                                             v.

 

                        The Childrens Aid Society of Cape Breton-Victoria

                                                                                                           Respondent

 

 

                                                             

                                                             

 

 

 

 

Restriction on publication:       pursuant to s. 94(1) of the Children & Family Services Act

 

Judge:                  The Honourable Justice Thomas Cromwell

 

Appeal Heard:      March 18, 2005

 

Subject:                Children and Family Services Act, S.N.S. 1990, c. 5 (CFSA) - time limits for disposition orders - permanent care without access

 

Summary:             The judge hearing an application to place the appellants two children in the permanent care of the agency without access reserved his decision and issued his order and written reasons after expiry of the time limit for the total duration of disposition orders under the CFSA.  The appellant appealed.

 


Issues:                 1.       Did the judge lose jurisdiction to proceed or err in law by virtue of exceeding the time limits?

2.      Did the judge err in failing to order access?

 

Result:                  Appeal dismissed.  The judge did not lose jurisdiction as he exceeded the time limit in order to complete his determination of what was in the best interests of the children.  He did, however, err in law by failing to determine that the extension of time was in the childrens best interests and by failing to constrain the length of the extension according to the principles in the CFSA.  However, appellate intervention was not justified in the circumstances of this case.  As for the judges refusal to order access, the judge made no reviewable error.

 

 

 

 

This information sheet does not form part of the courts judgment.  Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet.  The full court judgment consists of 15  pages.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.