Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
Citation: R. v. Frank, 2013 NSCA 148
Date: 20131217
Docket: CAC 382020
Registry: Halifax
Between:
Robert Douglas Frank
Appellant
v.
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Judge: |
Beveridge, J.A. |
Appeal Heard: |
December 3, 2013, in Halifax, Nova Scotia |
Subject: |
Criminal law |
Summary: |
The appellant wanted a relationship with an acquaintance. When that did not happen, he tormented her and her family. Charges of criminal harassment were laid. He was not deterred. Twenty-three additional charges followed, of breach of no contact conditions in undertakings and recognizances and damage to property. Convictions were entered on 20 of those charges, and he was sentenced to incarceration. |
Issues: |
Were the verdicts unreasonable or unsupported by the evidence |
Result: |
There was ample evidence to support the verdicts. But for one minor slip in the wording of how one conviction was entered, the decision by the trial judge was without error. The request by the appellant for the appeal to be allowed so that he can gather evidence to demonstrate he could not have committed some of the acts complained of is without merit. The slip by the trial judge was corrected by substituting a verdict pursuant to s. 686(3)(a) and affirming the sentence imposed. |
This information sheet does not form part of the court’s judgment. Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet. The full court judgment consists of 6 pages.