NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL
Citation: R. v. MacKenzie, 2007 NSCA 10
Date: 20070125
Docket: CAC 266773
Registry: Halifax
Between:
Daniel John MacKenzie
Appellant
v.
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Judge: The Honourable Justice Nancy Bateman
Appeal Heard: January 16, 2007
Subject: Ineffective assistance of counsel; sentence appeal
Summary: Appeal of both conviction and sentence in relation to a charge of break and entry with intent (s. 348(1)(a) Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46)
The appellant was found in a dwelling house. The defence at trial was that he was not the perpetrator. Pre-trial eyewitness identification was weak. The accused did not testified. He was convicted on dock identification and circumstantial evidence. He complains of ineffective assistance of counsel in, inter alia, advising him not to testify and of excessive sentence.
Issue: Is complaint of ineffective assistance made out? Is sentence excessive?
Result: Applying the reasonableness standard, ineffective assistance claim not made out. Three year sentence after credit for time served not excessive for this mature, repeat offender.