Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

Supreme Court of Nova Scotia

Citation: Concrete Shoring Technologies v. Civil Tech Construction Ltd., 2014 NSSC 459

Date: 20140613

Docket: Hfx No.  409794

Registry: Halifax

Between:

Concrete Shoring Technologies

Plaintiff

v.

Civil Tech Construction Ltd.

Defendant

Library Heading

 

Judge:

The Honourable Justice Patrick J. Murray

Heard:

April 16, 2014 in Halifax, Nova Scotia

Oral Decision:

June 13, 2014

Written Decision:

March 10, 2015

Subject:

Summary Judgment on the evidence.  Civil Procedure Rule 13.04.

Summary:

The Plaintiff, Concrete, sought Summary Judgment against the Defendant, Civil Tech.  At issue was whether Civil Tech was responsible for damage to construction materials (shoring) rented to it by Concrete.  Also, at issue was whether all of the equipment had been returned.  Competing affidavits were filed by the principals of both companies.

Issues:

Should summary judgement be granted?

Result:

The Court found that Concrete failed to meet its evidentiary burden on the first part of the two (2) stage test for summary judgment, because there were material facts in dispute.  The motion for summary judgment was therefore dismissed.

Caselaw:

Burton Canada Company v. Coady, 2013 NSCA 95; AGC Flat Glass North America Ltd. v. CCP Atlantic Specialty Products Inc., [2010] NSJ 140.

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.