Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

SUPREME COURT OF Nova Scotia

Family Division

 

 

Citation: Nova Scotia (Community Services) v. C.D.C , 2015 NSSC 123

Date: 20150420

Docket: Halifax, No.  SFHCFSA-085840

Registry: Halifax

Between:

MCS

Applicant

v.

C.D.C and S.D.C.

Respondents

 

And In the Matter of

 

 

                                                                                                Date: 20150420

Docket: Halifax, No. SFHMCA-059259

Registry: Halifax

Between:

C.D.C.

Applicant

v.

 

S.D.C.

Respondent

 

______________________________________________________________________________

                                                          LIBRARY HEADING

______________________________________________________________________________

 

Judge:             The Honourable Justice Beryl A. MacDonald           

 

Heard:                        March 11, 12, 13, 2015 

                                     

Keywords:      Family; Children and Family Services; Variation; Custody; Access 

 

Legislation:    Children and Family Services Act, S.N.S. 1990, c.5,

                        Maintenance and Custody Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 160           

 

Summary:      The Minister of Community Services had commenced a protection proceeding because the conflict between the parents presented a risk of emotional harm to the child. The child was diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder but was high functioning. The Minister was faced with the time limitations under the Act and considered the best plan for the child would be a termination of its’ proceeding and a variation of the previous shared parenting arrangement to place the child in the Mother’s custody and primary care with specific every second weekend access to the Father. The Father requested a return to the previous parenting arrangement. The court concluded the previous arrangement would lead to continuing conflict between the parties. The court ordered a very detailed parenting plan in which the Mother was to have custody and primary care. The Father’s access was to be every second weekend and one Thursday overnight on the week when he did not have weekend access. Holiday time was determined as were issues relating to pick up and drop off, transportation responsibility, exchange of information and communication.  

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURTS DECISION.           QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.