Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

                              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

 

                  Citation: Municipality of the County of Colchester v. Spencer 2004 NSSC 156

                                                                             

                                                                                                                                Date: 2004 08 09

                                                                                                                          Docket: S.T. 220896

                                                                                                                                   Registry: Truro

Between:

 

                                           Municipality of the County of Colchester

                                                                                  Plaintiff

                                                                           and

 

Winnifred Spencer

 

                                                                                                                                           Defendant

 

                                                            LIBRARY HEADING

 

Judge:           The Honourable Justice Gerald R. P. Moir

 

Heard:           1 June 2004 and 22 June 2004

 

Subjects:      Municipal Law; Dangerous or Unsightly Premises

 

Summary:    Colchester made an order under s. 346 of the Municipal Act requiring the owner of a junk yard to remove all junk and not bring new junk to the yard.  The operators rolled over their inventory of junk.  Colchester sought the aid of the Court under s. 352(3) to remove the new junk.

 

Issues:            Whether the discretion under s. 352(3) ought to be exercised?  Whether the municipality has the power to regulate land use under s. 346?

 

Result:            Colchester did not clearly notify the respondent of the prospective nature of the dangerous and unsightly premises remedy sought before Committee of the Whole and it failed to disabuse the operators of their understanding that rolling over the inventory would be sufficient.  Discretion declined.  In any event, municipalities do not have statutory authority to regulate land use through their powers respecting dangerous or unsightly premises.  For the latter, municipalities must objectively assess whether the premises are unsightly or dangerous for the kind of use they are lawfully being put to: Chester v. Aloni, [1996] N.S.J. 107 (CA).

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.